Proefschriften Verpleegkunde

Nederlandse titel proefschrift[Delier bij oudere poliklinische patiënten. Opsporing, prevalentie en prognose]
Engelse titel proefschriftDelirium in older outpatients. Detection, prevalence and prognosis
Naam gepromoveerdeQuispel – Aggenbach, Daisy
Datum promotie21/12/2022
Linkedin-accountlinkedin.com
Researchgate-urlresearchgate.net
UniversiteitRijksuniversiteit Groningen
Doctor is verpleegkundige (geweest)
  • Ja
(Co)promotorenprof. dr. S.U. Zuidema. Copromotor: dr. H.J. Luijendijk
Samenvatting (Engels)

Little is known about delirium in older outpatients. Due to its serious long -and short-term consequences in hospitalized and nursing home patients, it was considered important to get more insight in various topics related to delirium in older outpatients. This thesis presents studies about screening instruments for, and prevalence and prognosis of delirium in this patient group. Screening instrumentsThe aim of the first study (chapter 2) was to review studies that tested the diagnostic quality of rapid screening instruments for delirium. A literature search was performed in the digital bibliographies PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase. We included delirium screening instruments that could be administered in 3 minutes or less, and did not require information from (in)formal caregivers. We did not exclude on setting. Twenty-seven studies among 4,766 patients in hospitals and nursing homes were identified. Many different single and several combined screening tools had been tested. Only one study scored a low risk of bias on all assessed domains. Sensitivity of the tools varied between 17% and 100%, and specificity between 38% and 99%. Two tests had high sensitivity and high specificity in more than one study among older hospitalized patients: the OSLA and RASS. Tests of arousal seemed to perform well in patients with dementia too, but results need to be reproduced in larger populations and long-term care settings.The aim of the second study (chapter 3) was to estimate the test accuracy of four observations, three explorations and four short tests that are commonly used in a psychiatric examination to detect attention disorders in older outpatients. The index tests were applied without knowledge of the presence of delirium. Also, a geriatrician or psychiatrist blinded to the results of the index tests determined the diagnosis of delirium. Test accuracy was calculated for the single items and combinations. “Dozing off during conversation” scored high specificity as did “Dozing off when not stimulated”, but both had low sensitivity. Diagnostic quality of the exploration questions was low. Serial 7s and WORLD spelled backwards had high sensitivity but low specificity. The best combination was MOTYB with WORLD spelled backward, but the test accuracy was still only moderate. The aim of the third study (chapter 4) was to develop a short and sensitive questionnaire for triage of older outpatients with cognitive impairment that could be administered to a caregiver by telephone. In the first phase, we tested a pilot questionnaire with 17 items. We used the results and other information available at referral to construct the final delirium caregiver questionnaire (DCQ). During the second phase, we investigated the diagnostic quality of the final 7-item DCQ in a subsequent cohort. We found that the DCQ was testpositive in three-quarter of patients with delirium, but also in a quarter of patients without delirium. The mean number of days to the first assessment of delirious patients dropped considerably from 32 to 11. Hence, triage with the easy-to-use DCQ among patients referred for cognitive screening led to earlier assessment and higher detection rates of delirium. Prevalence and prognosisThe aim of the fourth study (chapter 5) was to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of delirium in older outpatients with and without dementia. We assessed 444 patients referred to the memory clinic of a psychiatric hospital. We used the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 and DSM-IV-TR criteria to diagnose delirium. We found a prevalence of probable delirium of 19%, and of possible delirium of 2%. The most common triggers were infection, drug 130128intoxication or withdrawal, and metabolic/ endocrine disturbance. Often, more than one precipitating trigger was identified, on top of multiple predisposing factors. Age and prior delirium were independent non-modifiable factors associated with an increased risk of delirium, but a diagnosis of dementia before intake was not significantly related to an increased risk of delirium at intake.The aim of the last study (chapter 6) was to investigate the prognosis of delirium in older patients living at home. The study population consisted of 85 outpatients diagnosed with delirium. Seventeen patients had already diagnosed dementia. Three months after the diagnosis delirium consenting patients underwent a follow-up visit. We recorded delirium status (remitted or not), new dementia diagnosis, subjective cognitive functioning compared to baseline and to before delirium, level of daily functioning and place of residence. After three months, 45 (53%) had recovered from delirium, 19 (22%) had persistent/ recurrent delirium, 12 (14%) patients had died, and another 9 (11%) could not be revisited for other reasons than death. None of the re-examined patients reported that their cognitive functioning had recovered to the pre-delirium level, and the mean level of daily functioning did notimprove substantially

Samenvatting (Nederlands)

Delirium is een toestandsbeeld van geestelijke verwarring, die vaak ontstaat door een lichamelijke ziekte. Een delirium kan ernstige gevolgen hebben, en daarom is het belangrijk om het delier zo vroeg mogelijk op te sporen en te behandelen. Er is echter nog weinig bekend over hoe vaak een delirium bij thuiswonende oudere poliklinische patiënten van een psychiatrisch ziekenhuis voorkomt. Daarom onderzocht Quispel-Aggenbach in dit proefschrift screeningsinstrumenten om delirium bij deze doelgroep snel vast te stellen, en keek ze naar het voorkomen, de risicofactoren en de prognose van deze aandoening.

Een screeningsinstrument kan tijdens telefonisch contact met mantelzorgers worden ingezet en daar snel bepalen of de patiënt nader diagnostisch onderzocht moet worden. Quispel-Aggenbach onderzocht 27 screeningsinstrumenten die artsen konden vertellen of er sprake kon zijn van een delier, waarvan twee een hoge selectiviteit en een hoge specificiteit hadden. Een dergelijk screeningsinstrument kan mantelzorgers helpen voor triage bij verwijzing. Korte alertheidstesten bleken ook nuttig te zijn om delirium bij thuiswonende ouderen te identificeren.

Uit het onderzoek van de promovendus bleek dat ongeveer 20 procent van de oudere poliklinische patiënten waarschijnlijk last had van een delirium. De meest voorkomende triggers waren infectie, drugsgebruik of -ontwenning en metabole of endocriene stoornissen. De helft van de patiënten die Quispel-Aggenbach onderzocht herstelde binnen drie maanden van hun delier, al was geen van de patiënten hersteld tot op hetzelfde cognitieve niveau als voor het delirium.

Met deze resultaten hoopt Quispel-Aggenbach meer zicht te geven op delirium bij oudere poliklinische patiënten. Meer onderzoek is nog wel nodig, onder andere om te bepalen hoe een delirium bij patiënten met een hoog risico kan worden voorkomen.

Copyright
  • Uploading his/her dissertation and additional information the author agrees with publication on this website. The author should in advance obtain permission from any other copyright holders for publication on this site.
Proefschrift (Engels) PDFComplete_thesis-Quispel.pdf